Check Out Our Sports Photo Galleries Contact Us
Examining the free market myth
by Jeff Blanck
Oct 20, 2008 | 534 views | 1 1 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Have you heard the phrase, “The silence is deafening?” That’s what we are hearing from the free market conservatives: silence. Ever since Reagan, there has been an attack on government as being too big and too controlling in the market place. The party line traditionally stated that if we could only downsize government and let the free market run its course then we would all be happy and financially secure. Well, we have had a big reality check. The free market doesn’t really exist. Our government has a long history of bailing out the market and controlling it in the first place.

In the first session of Congress, the government meddled in the free market by establishing tariffs to help local manufacturers and partnered with several private banks to form a national bank. In the early 1800s, the government gave away millions of acres of land to the railroads for free as well as saving the railroads from financial ruin by making government loans. The corporations got saved but not the thousands of Chinese and other immigrants who worked on the railroad. The laborers didn’t get any benefit from the government assistance. They still worked for small wages, no benefits and long hours in unsafe conditions.

This trend of government bailing out big business and doing nothing for the common worker carried over into the 1900s. During the Depression (the one in 1929), President Hoover refused to give aid to individuals because he considered it socialism. But corporations still received government subsidies. The “trickle down” theory didn’t work then and it didn’t work for Reagan either.

After World War II the government had to bail out the aircraft industry and subsidize the oil industry (which is still happening now despite their record profits). Then we all remember the Chrysler bailout and the savings and loan debacle of the 1980s that cost us hundreds of billions of dollars. After all these years, you would think we would want to try something different than corporate bailouts.

How about giving the money to the people who actually need it? Don’t take $700 billion and reward failed greedy and corrupt corporations but give it to the people who lost their retirement or their homes. The corporations deserve to fail and we should let them die.

What brought America out of the Depression was Roosevelt’s New Deal. Millions of people were put to work rebuilding our own country’s infrastructure. There was the Civilian Conservation Corps, artist subsidies to paint murals and write plays, as well as the start of Social Security and the GI Bill. This was a time of the government helping the people, not inanimate corporations, and it worked. Then, as now, some people called it socialism but any government is socialistic by its very existence. You have a government when people pool their resources together for the common good.

So forget the “free market” as the savior of society. The “free market” only exists because our government keeps on bailing it out. Our government is for the people and by the people and it should do what is best for the majority of the people. We need government intervention and regulation in the “free market” to assure that the most benefit goes to the most of the people.

Jeff Blanck is an attorney in private practice in Reno. He can be reached at jblanck@jeffreyblancklaw.com.
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
William P. McMillen
|
October 24, 2008
The free market does not exist for the very reason that the government is there to bail it out. Our financial problem is not the failure of the free market, it is the failure from those exercising oversight to do their jobs. Any organization, government or business without adequate controls leads to theft, embezzelment, and fraud. The banking system should not be run by the same people who operate the justice department. And the party that has pretended to support free markets has only used their rhetoric as a means to loot the Treasury and provide sweetheart contracts to their cronies. In the name of deregulation, they have turned off the traffic lights and after several high profile accidents, Henry Paulson stepped in to direct traffic and only managed to accomplish gridlock. We don't need government solutions, but we could use leadership that does not mislable their political and economic philosophy. I'm voting for Barack Obama.
Featured Businesses