Part 1 of 2: Wind turbine project rallies valley residents
by Cortney Maddock
Feb 19, 2009 | 549 views | 2 2 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
<a href= mailto:dreid@dailysparkstribune.com>Tribune/Debra Reid</a> - Dan Herman shuts a gate on his Palomino Valley retirement property. Herman believes if two windmills are built on a nearby ridge, the silence and natural beauty of his land will be gone forever.
Tribune/Debra Reid - Dan Herman shuts a gate on his Palomino Valley retirement property. Herman believes if two windmills are built on a nearby ridge, the silence and natural beauty of his land will be gone forever.
slideshow
More than 20 miles to the closest shopping center in Spanish Springs, driving north on Pyramid Highway is a dirt road that winds around corners created by boulders in the pathway. Nestled behind rolling hills and jagged peaks are a mix of new and older homes, ranches with horses and goats.

The Palomino Valley streets are labeled Wilcox Ranch Road, Quaking Aspen, Microwave Road, but each street narrows from a two-lane unpaved track to a narrow lane in which someone would have to pull onto the shoulder for on-coming traffic to pass.

Soon, these country roads could be teeming with semi-trucks hauling parts to build wind turbines that would dot the ridgeline as part of the Virginia Peak Wind Project that is being developed by green energy firm Nevada Wind, LLC.

“Nevada Wind is an LLC, we have been in existence for the past eight years,” managing partner Tim Carlson said. “We presently have nine various locations throughout Nevada that are going through the first phases of development.”

Nevada Wind won a small battle with the Washoe County Planning Commission on Feb. 4 when the panel unanimously voted to approve a special-use permit for the project slated for development in the Palomino Valley, approximately 30 miles north of Sparks.

The commission approved the project with 44 wind turbines, though Carlson said the number of turbines has decreased since the application process began in July. Along with the decrease in the number of turbines, the commission has placed 72 conditions on the project.

Washoe County Senior Planner Trevor Lloyd explained that the conditions on the project have come about in different ways.

“Our staff will impose conditions, a number of reviewing agencies at the county, state and federal level as well as public comment at meetings can impose conditions” Lloyd said.

The 72 conditions on the Virginia Peak Wind Project have been implemented as a way to protect valley residents and county interests. Some of the conditions include limitations on construction traffic, limiting noise from the turbines and the minimum distance of the wind turbines from existing houses, which is set at one mile.

Then the project hit a snag Tuesday when nearby landowner Dan Herman filed an appeal.

“Well, the only thing I appealed is the one condition that allowed the two windmills on the property at the end of Quaking Aspen that directly affects the surrounding neighbors,” Herman said. “It’s not the whole project I am appealing. I am asking the county to take another look at those windmills.”

The turbines Herman is appealing are on property owned by real estate leasing company XO, LLC. Ed Lord, managing member of XO, said at the Feb. 4 meeting that the commission could not remove the turbines on his property because he already obtained a contract with Nevada Wind. Lord previously had four wind turbines on XO property but a condition was implemented to remove two of the southernmost turbines.

“I was against the project for almost a year,” said Lord, who owns 3,200 acres in the valley. “Initially I didn’t think it was going to be good for my property. I took a year to think about it.”

At the Feb. 4 meeting, the planning commission commission pondered adding a condition to remove all four turbines from the property. Both Lord and Carlson spoke at the meeting and said that the removal of all four turbines could result in a contract dispute.

Nevada Wind said that the closest turbine cannot be within one mile of the nearest existing structure and that the project does not have any planned turbines within that distance, but residents have been concerned about the two remaining turbines on XO’s property and their proximity to existing homes.

“There is a lot of people who bought property there and have planned on retiring there, and it will affect our property values and our way of life,” Herman said about the wind turbines.

Herman owns 120 arces in the valley — the future site of his dream retirement home.

“I’m planning to build and plan on doing an off-grid house with solar panels,” Herman said. “A lot of people in the valley are off grid.”

Residents in Palomino Valley who are off the grid, meaning they supply their homes with energy from solar power or backup generators, would not benefit from the power produced from the wind turbines since Nevada Wind hopes to sell the power to NV Energy.

“We have submitted our project to NV Energy,” Carlson said. “We hope to be selected as an energy that they would want to partner with. We feel very comfortable there will be a contract available to us in the future. It is a very complex process and they are taking their time to do it right.”

Carlson said that Nevada Wind understands the residents’ concerns but that the residents who are opposing the project, or parts of it, are the minority in the valley. He added that Nevada Wind intends to take its time with the project and develop it correctly.

Residents are still skeptical of Nevada Wind and its ability to consider their concerns as well as the company’s own interests.

For the continuation of this story, read Saturday’s Daily Sparks Tribune.
comments (2)
« nvhorseman wrote on Friday, Feb 20 at 02:01 PM »
Had NV Wind, LLC and the county representative Trevor Lloyd presented their project truthfully and without reserve from the beginning, much of the residual resentment would have been mitigated. The only reason this project is on private land is that NV Wind LLC, didn't want to spend the time or the money to go through an Environmental Impact Statement process. The roads in this valley are private and the county is now trying to set a precedent to make access to valleys like this open to Industrial Development. We are zoned Rural Residential and most people have at least 40 acres here. No one bothered to tell the residents here that our mountain tops had been zoned for industrial development. The county and NV Wind owners consistently failed to notify residents, especially residents along the materials haul route through the valley, of any information, times of meetings, opportunities or phone numbers or email addresses of where to communicate our concerns. From the beginning, the vast, as in 90% or more, or the residents at the meetings were against the project. Yet Mr. Lloyd kept repeating that this was a project of regional significance and that we could not stop it. Regional significance translates into "Harry Reid, Gov. Gibbons, Bob Larkin, et.al.," want it to get their "GREEN" merit badge, so indeed no one could stop approval of the Industrial Wind Project on Virginia Peak. However, this "green" wind energy is far more expensive than solar or geothermal produced energy, both of which we have in great abundance yet all the money goes to wind. Why? Because you can capitalize ($$) wind at a far greater value than you can solar or geothermal. More capitalization equals more TAX CREDITS to the developer. That's TAXPAYER money folks. Then, to produce the electricity the Developer or the utility will get TAX SUBSIDIES. That's TAXPAYER money folks. Because wind energy cannot compete with natural gas or coal fired base load electricity generators, none of which will be replaced with wind energy, all of our utility rates will go UP! We cannot sell the wind energy because our poor leadership in this state has not built the infrastructure such as a north-south transmission line to get the wind energy to Las Vegas, Los Angeles, or Phoenix where it is really needed and where we could sell it at a good price and make the state some money. Our GOV. wants to give money away to the largest of the lobbyists for alternative energy, WIND. TAXPAYER money give-aways to socialize CORPORATE profit. Sound familiar anyone.
« Ms K wrote on Friday, Feb 20 at 11:51 AM »
Removing the two southernmost wind turbines from the XO, LLC property would go a long way towards Nevada Wind redeeming itself in the residents' eyes. The petition circulated last month that requested numerous conditions be attached to any approval of the project by the Planning Commission gathered over 350 signatures, the bulk of those from Palomino Valley property owners and residents - not exactly a "minority" of those in the valley. Some of the conditions were granted but most were not, incl the removal of the two disputed turbines. It is unknown if there is even sufficient wind on this southern parcel to make the construction of the turbines worthwhile.

Additionally, there was no condition imposed by the Planning Commmission, County staff, or Nevada Wind to address the potential noise impact of these gargantuan turbines. The noise impact was dismissed as a nonissue by all of the above despite compelling testimony by numerous individuals, incl the local chapter Sierra Club Chair, who spoke out in favor of a baseline noise study.

I applaud Mr. Herman's efforts to fight for what he believes in. I also feel that Nevada Wind could have taken alternative approaches to building its wind facility which would have made the whole project more palatable to the Palomino Valley residents. Instead of bulldozing through private property and disrupting the rural community, it could have accessed the Virginia Peak site from the east side of the mountain, from BLM land, as is the case with their competitor Ridgeline. Nevada Wind does not feel the need or have the apparent conscience to conduct any enviromental impact studies so they brush off anyone suggesting the alternative east side approach. This project is about money, folks. It's not about the environment, the community, or green house gases. It's money, greed, and political muscle that is driving this project.

So, I have to say with a ringing endorsement "Go, Dan Herman, go!!!" I certainly hope you - the little guy - prevail.

report abuse...

We consider the comments section of www.dailysparkstribune.com to be a key part of a constructive community dialogue. Your comments will appear as you type them. The Daily Sparks Tribune does not prescreen contributions to the comments section. Individuals posting libelous statements may be held responsible.